OpenAI vs Anthropic: Complete LLM Comparison for 2026
Compare OpenAI GPT-4o and Anthropic Claude for your AI applications. Detailed analysis of capabilities, pricing, and best use cases.
Test Both Models FreeHead-to-Head Comparison
| Category | OpenAI GPT-4o | Anthropic Claude | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 128K tokens | 200K tokens | Claude |
| Code Generation | Excellent | Very Good | GPT-4o |
| Reasoning | Very Good | Excellent | Claude |
| Speed | Fast | Fast | Tie |
OpenAI GPT-4o
Key Strengths
- Excellent at code generation and debugging
- Strong multimodal capabilities (vision, audio)
- Vast ecosystem and tooling support
- Fast response times for most queries
Best For
Code generation and reviewMultimodal applicationsGeneral-purpose assistantsAPI integrations
Anthropic Claude
Key Strengths
- Superior long-context handling (200K tokens)
- Excellent at nuanced reasoning
- Strong safety and alignment features
- Better at following complex instructions
Best For
Document analysis and summarizationComplex reasoning tasksSafety-critical applicationsLong-form content generation
Test OpenAI and Anthropic Side by Side
Use PromptLens to run the same prompts on both models and compare outputs objectively. Find the best model for your use case.
Start Free Comparison