GPT-4o vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Which Model Should You Choose?
Head-to-head comparison of GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Analyze performance, pricing, and ideal use cases for your AI project.
Test Both Models FreeHead-to-Head Comparison
| Category | GPT-4o | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Very Good | Excellent | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
| Multimodal | Excellent | Good | GPT-4o |
| Instruction Following | Very Good | Excellent | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
| Cost Efficiency | Good | Excellent | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
GPT-4o
Key Strengths
- Native multimodal capabilities
- Real-time audio and vision processing
- Optimized for conversational AI
- Lower latency for interactive apps
Best For
Voice assistantsReal-time applicationsInteractive chatbotsMultimodal experiences
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Key Strengths
- Best-in-class coding abilities
- Excellent instruction following
- Strong analytical capabilities
- Consistent output quality
Best For
Code generation and reviewTechnical documentationData analysis tasksComplex workflows
Test GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet Side by Side
Use PromptLens to run the same prompts on both models and compare outputs objectively. Find the best model for your use case.
Start Free Comparison